
Dear Director Mayorkas:
Last week in a speech you broached the subject of the possible need to increase filing fees because of a decrease in the number of applications received by USCIS this fiscal year. You also noted that there was over $100 million shortfall in your budget because of these decreased filings. I have some suggestions to meet your budget.
First, look at your budget projections from this last year. Last October, who didn’t see the recession? Why weren’t reductions in force made at that time? On April 1 when only 33% of the H-1B applications were filed as compared to the year before, why didn’t USCIS staff get pared down? A monumental increase in naturalization applications occurred before the Presidential elections (as they do every 4 years), who did not not see a decrease in naturalization applications for 2009! My heck, every business in America was laying off employees, but not USCIS!
Second, have a heart to heart talk with anyone who issues an RFE that requires more than 5 pages to respond to. This last week we submitted a 3,000 page (30 lb.) response to an RFE (see the picture above), which alleged that an Accountant was not a professional position! Director, what is the deal with your Service Centers? Is there simply too little to do and too many employees? The “service” we are receiving as your customers is not doing the American Economy any good.
Third, why are the local adjudications officers interviewing non-current priority date visa applicants, including on Saturdays in September! You are paying OVERTIME to examiners to interview people who cannot be approved for their green cards. What sense does that make?
I have many other ideas as well if you would like to chat. The bottom line is this. The agency you have just taken over is in serious need of a top to bottom review. You have a monstrous challenge ahead of you to bring this agency in line with the priorities it should have. Priorities that not only include national security, but also ensuring our own economic well being and competitiveness by promoting job growth and allowing companies to hire qualified workers, keeping families together through reunification, and bringing new citizens into the fold.
You need to get control of service centers, where officers are issuing, at increasingly frequent rates, Requests for Evidence that are not only unnecessary, but which are onerous and burdensome, and appear to be designed to make the employer give up his request for the visa application. You have local offices finding marriage “fraud” where no such fraud exists. You have CIS doing 25,000 random walk ins of legitimate U.S. employers of H-1B workers, disrupting the workplace asking questions about the H-1B employer, without regard to a lawyers appearance in the case in clear violation of the 6th Amendment. The list could go on about what your agency is doing wrong. And, while there are things USCIS does right, the reality is that rather than serving immigrants and their employers, you are punishing them.
So, before you raise your fees, I think you MUST first get your own house in order. You should not and cannot honestly balance your budgetary disaster on the backs of the employers and immigrants you are committed to serving.
With all sincerity, I wish you the best of luck in your new position.
I agree 100%. Budget issue due to USCIS mess up and Country's economy should not be at the cost of the immigrants The legal immigrants (H1B's)who pays taxes, Social Security ….. and gets very little or nothing out of it will be even more pressed due to any increase in the filing charges as it would reflect indirectly on their salary and benifits!
PM
I applied for a Fiancé Visa for my girl and got an RFE, the two months are about to pass in one week and I have read that the USCIS can ask for another six months without any explanation.
1. Is this true?
2. How many extension can they get?
3. Can they deny our visa for no reason?
Thanks,
Dorian
Well, at least Clorox might now be able to hire additional foreign workers…
At today's IOC Hearings, one Pakistani IOC Representative questioned the ability of the U.S. to treat foreigners wanting to visit for a U.S. Olympics with respect to visa issuance.
There is no doubt, in my mind, that the experiences of foreigners in trying to navigate through the U.S. Visa system have a direct impact upon International Relations. With subtle, yet apparent, international disappointment like this, it is no wonder that Chicago's Olympic Bid fell on tone deaf IOC ears.
Dear Mr. Kuck,
Thank you for this posting – it is exactly on point. I am see horrible RFE's, especially from the California Service Center. These RFE's are issued in cases of well established companies who provide valuable jobs and services in our economy. I think you expressed all of our frustrations very well. I only hope that USCIS will listen. We are becoming a national of anti-immigrants.
We are frustrated with unending RFE's, almost all the time we include contracts, P.O's, evaluation, report all confirming the specialty occupation but USCIS repeats same thing again n again, at least this posting should touch them & have some sense to send RFE's especially for companies that are well established and having million dollars returns which is inturn good for America.
AILA must call for a strike. Members should not file any petitions at least for a week… except emergency cases. We must show our frustration by not filing any petitions.
I am working on 18 RFEs for the same employer, all RFEs issued by same officer/same day, each RFE asking for the same 450 pages tax returns, last 4 quarters wage statement, business lic, lease papers, tel bills, etc. Already I have changed two toners, and used 5000 sheets (one full box of papers). Recently CSC has added “canceled pay checks from the previous employer” instead pay statements to prove the maintenance of status. The beneficiary was unable to get the canceled checks from his previous employer.
Employers not filing many petitions just because of the increased amount of RFEs, and site visits. In many cases end-clients(?) don’t want to write a letter confirming the job availability. I have a case where the client terminated the agreement, just because the employer asked for client letter to support their H1B petition.. the beneficiary is out of job.
Yeah Chuck! I was told on the phone yesterday by one of the old timer local USCIS officers that she has to clean up the crap of some of the newer officers. I am going to send her some Clorox wipes!
Old timer was nice enough to call me to fax in 2 missing documents. I told her I submitted the documents, as I always do, and that we had an incompetent officer at interview. She laughed, looked in the section of the file where only USCIS internal docs are supposed to go, and found the 2 "missing" documents. Approval today!
Bravo for taking the Service to task. Like most practitioners, I've been regularly getting RFEs asking for what's already been submitted. USIS has to ask itself what good it is throw this kind of grit into the gears of commerce, seeing as how it deprives businesses of highly skilled employees and cuts the flow of taxes into local coffers. If the Service just wants to keep people employed, fine, but maybe they can pay them to speed things up rather than slow them down.
Right on! This post couldn't have come at a better time as I am sitting here responding to another ridiculous RFE.
Thank you for this statement. I was given an analysis on an RFE this week for an O visa that requested an impact study on the cutting edge scientific work that my client was doing for clean energy company that was featured in Small Business Fortune. I believe someone is pushing ideology and bureaucracy over the needs of this country and the American people and its companies. The Soviet Union was a country entrenched in ideology and bureaucracy, America's promise was supposed to be something different.
Did you 2-hole punch this one with ACCO fasteners? I loved the Service's retraction of the option of sending these massive responses on a PDF written compact disc!
Way to go Chuck! We received a transmittal from the USCIS stating that our appeal (that was timely filed) was being rejected because "…you waited until the last minute to file the appeal." AILA as an organization, must do much more to point these out to the USCIS in an effort to assist them in streamlining their process and thus making the process fairer & more efficient to all stakeholders.
Dear Chuck,
Thank you.Your letter to USCIS Director Mayorkas is a well-written message regarding a "save our newly hired staff" phenomenon that has occurred because of the downturn in the economy resulting
in decreased filings. USCIS wants to retain its
level of staffing, and investment in the purported training of its young staff- thus the agonized, belabored process Petitioners' attorneys go through to attempt to realize statutorily -mandated benefits for their clients. The question arises, can we, as a professional organization, assist USCIS in properly adjudicating cases without the unnecessary RFES and denials, while retaining their staffing levels? Sincerely, Pat Wohlford
Chuck:
I think as an organization we need to restart our efforts to litigate against USCIS abuses. When we read liaison minutes, it seems like AILA is constantly asking USCIS "how far up your posterior can we stick our noses?" rather than fighting their utter disdain for statutory and regulatory requirements, and the apparent attitude of "we'll deny, you appeal while your client get screwed." Has the organization lost its backbone? Where are the Sam Williamsons when he is most needed?
Chuck, did you send in the Clorox wipes with the RFE to help USCIS disinfect the crap that comes out of that place?
Absolutely right. We filed AOS three times and during those three times they sent RFE while what they were looking for was in the file already.